Rehberg asks more funding for rural, frontier schools
Rep. Denny Rehberg on Thursday urged Department of Education Secretary Arne Duncan to rethink proposed changes to the allocation of federal education funds. Rehberg is concerned that new competitive funding formulas would undermine the health of rural schools at the expense of large urban schools. Eighty-five percent of Montana’s students attend rural or frontier schools.
“Once again, the Administration is looking at policy through an urban filter, putting rural needs on a back burner,” said Rehberg, a member of the House Rural Education Caucus. “In recent weeks, I’ve heard from dozens of Montana educators who asked me to fight for an increase in reliable formula funding, instead of competitive grants. It’s not that they’re afraid of fair competition, it’s that rural communities don’t have the raw resources to compete against urban schools. If you’ve only got a staff of two, you’re not going to be able to hire a full-time grant-writer.”
Rehberg also expressed concerns about the Administration’s proposals for turning around low-performing schools. The four proposed models mandate a one-size-fits-all policy that would require low-performing schools to fire the principal, replace the teachers, lengthen the school day, change the curriculum or agree to become a charter school if they want to continue receiving federal dollars. During the hearing, Rehberg asked if the Department of Education would be willing to work with his office and the House Rural Education Caucus to develop other turnaround models that are more realistic for rural schools.
“While we all agree that we need to help low-performing schools improve, we can’t continue to force urban-based solutions on our rural schools,” said Rehberg. “Rural schools face their own unique challenges and we need the Department of Education to provide Montana’s schools with the flexibility to solve these issues. Mandating top-down solutions isn’t going to help turnaround Montana’s schools.”
“Montana’s schools are committed to providing our children with a quality education, but switching from guaranteed formula funding to competitive grants will create a disadvantage for our students,” said Claudette Morton, Exec. Director, Montana Small Schools Alliance. “I commend Mr. Rehberg for ensuring that rural schools have a voice at the table throughout this process, and I look forward to working with him to build an education system that works for all of Montana’s children.”
Rehberg will continue to accept comments on the proposed changes to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act through March 24. These comments will be submitted to the House Committee on Education and Labor as they develop and implement changes to the current federal education guidelines. Comments can be submitted by e-mail to montanaeducators@mail.house.gov.
###
“Once again, the Administration is looking at policy through an urban filter, putting rural needs on a back burner,” said Rehberg, a member of the House Rural Education Caucus. “In recent weeks, I’ve heard from dozens of Montana educators who asked me to fight for an increase in reliable formula funding, instead of competitive grants. It’s not that they’re afraid of fair competition, it’s that rural communities don’t have the raw resources to compete against urban schools. If you’ve only got a staff of two, you’re not going to be able to hire a full-time grant-writer.”
Rehberg also expressed concerns about the Administration’s proposals for turning around low-performing schools. The four proposed models mandate a one-size-fits-all policy that would require low-performing schools to fire the principal, replace the teachers, lengthen the school day, change the curriculum or agree to become a charter school if they want to continue receiving federal dollars. During the hearing, Rehberg asked if the Department of Education would be willing to work with his office and the House Rural Education Caucus to develop other turnaround models that are more realistic for rural schools.
“While we all agree that we need to help low-performing schools improve, we can’t continue to force urban-based solutions on our rural schools,” said Rehberg. “Rural schools face their own unique challenges and we need the Department of Education to provide Montana’s schools with the flexibility to solve these issues. Mandating top-down solutions isn’t going to help turnaround Montana’s schools.”
“Montana’s schools are committed to providing our children with a quality education, but switching from guaranteed formula funding to competitive grants will create a disadvantage for our students,” said Claudette Morton, Exec. Director, Montana Small Schools Alliance. “I commend Mr. Rehberg for ensuring that rural schools have a voice at the table throughout this process, and I look forward to working with him to build an education system that works for all of Montana’s children.”
Rehberg will continue to accept comments on the proposed changes to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act through March 24. These comments will be submitted to the House Committee on Education and Labor as they develop and implement changes to the current federal education guidelines. Comments can be submitted by e-mail to montanaeducators@mail.house.gov.
###